Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOzgur, Armagan/0000-0001-9111-8060
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKulak, Ali Ender
dc.contributor.authorTotan, Yuksel
dc.contributor.authorYuvarlak, Armagan
dc.contributor.authorHepsen, Ibrahim Feyzi
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-24T18:08:59Z
dc.date.available2025-10-24T18:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentMalatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of a new partial coherence interferometry optical biometer (AL-Scan, Nidek CO, Aichi, Japan) with optical low-coherence reflectometry device (Lenstar LS 900, Haag-Streit AG, Koniz, Switzerland). Methods: Three consecutive measurements with the 2 devices were performed by the same examiner in 65 eyes of 65 patients with cataract. Patients were divided into 2 groups: axial length (AL) between 22 and 26 mm (Group 1) and more than 26 mm (Group 2). Comparisons were performed for AL, anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry (K, over 2.4 mm diameter for AL-Scan and 2.3 mm diameter for Lenstar) and corneal diameter (CD). Repeatability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the agreement was by the Bland-Altman method. Results: The repeatability of both devices was high for all biometry measurements (ICC over 0.970) in Group 1 and 2. The best repeatability was achieved for AL in each group. In both groups, the differences were statistically significant for all parameters (p < 0.05) except for the measurement of AL and CCT (p > 0.05). The Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between devices for all measurements in both groups. The closest agreement was for the AL measurements (ranged from -0.06 to 0.08 mm in Group 1 and 0.05-0.07 mm in Group 2). Conclusions: The new biometer provided excellent repeatability for all ocular biometry. In addition, there was good agreement between AL-Scan and Lenstar biometers for all parameters in cataractous patients with medium and long ALs. (C) 2016 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clae.2016.06.001
dc.identifier.endpage341
dc.identifier.issn1367-0484
dc.identifier.issn1476-5411
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid27344235
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84990882997
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage336
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2016.06.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12899/3399
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000384102700004
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv
dc.relation.ispartofContact Lens & Anterior Eye
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20251023
dc.subjectAL-Scan; Lenstar; Repeatability; Agreement; Cataract
dc.titleComparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu