Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Simulated Keratometry Using Galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius Devices

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAnayol, Mustafa A.
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Emre
dc.contributor.authorYagci, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorSekeroglu, Mehmet A.
dc.contributor.authorYilmazoglu, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorTirhis, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKulak, Ali E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-24T18:09:17Z
dc.date.available2025-10-24T18:09:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentMalatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim was to evaluate the agreement in the central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and mean simulated keratometry (simK) measurements using Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius Scheimpflug systems in normal eyes. Methods: Anterior segment measurements were performed with Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius devices in 32 healthy subjects. The right eye of each participant was selected. Measurements obtained with the 3 systems were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. Results: Analysis of variance determined a significant difference in the anterior segment measurements of CCT, TCT, ACD, and simK between the 3 devices (P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons of CCT and TCT measurements were significantly different except for the comparison between Pentacam and Sirius. All pairwise comparisons for ACD were statistically significant. The pairwise comparison results for simK values showed that the Galilei and Sirius systems demonstrated better agreement with each other than with Pentacam. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the Pentacam, Galilei, and Sirius Scheimpflug systems should not be accepted as interchangeable for CCT, TCT, ACD, and simK in healthy subjects.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ICO.0000000000000119
dc.identifier.endpage586
dc.identifier.issn0277-3740
dc.identifier.issn1536-4798
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid24763122
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84900826130
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage582
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000119
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12899/3567
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000337057100011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofCornea
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20251023
dc.subjectcentral corneal thickness; thinnest corneal thickness; anterior chamber depth; simulated keratometry; Pentacam; Galilei; Sirius
dc.titleComparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Simulated Keratometry Using Galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius Devices
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu