Comparison Of Intrathecal Plain Articaine And Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl For Caesarean Section

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDemircioğlu, Rüveyda İrem
dc.contributor.authorGoz?demir, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorUsta, Burhanettin
dc.contributor.authorSert, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorKarabayirli, Safinaz
dc.contributor.authorMuslu, Bünyamin
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Esra Aktepe
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-24T18:06:44Z
dc.date.available2025-10-24T18:06:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentMalatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Articaine is used as a local anesthetic for outpatient surgery because it offers rapid onset of anesthesia and short duration motor block. Levobupivacaine is often preferred for Caesarean section. We evaluated the anesthetic characteristics of fentanyl-supplemented plain articaine and levobupivacaine for Caesarean section under combine spinal epidural anesthesia. Methods: Patients undergoing Caesarean section received in random order plain articaine 40 mg (Group A, n=50) or plain levobupivacaine 10 mg (Group L, n=50) mixed with fentanyl 20 ?g intrathecally. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, first analgesic request, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. Results: Onset times of maximum motor block were longer in Group L than Group A (P=0,001). Time to two-segment regression of sensory block were 70 min for Group A and 90 min group L (P=0.001). Times to complete regression of motor blockade were significantly longer in group L than group A (P =0,001). Conclusion: To have a faster onset and shorter duration of spinal anesthesia, we recommend the use of plain articaine for Caesarean section © 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.25011/CIM.V39I6.27516
dc.identifier.endpage32
dc.identifier.issn0147-958X
dc.identifier.issn1488-2353
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid27917806
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85047588894
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage25
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.rog/10.25011/CIM.V39I6.27516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12899/3180
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Canadian Society for Clinical Investigation
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Investigative Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzScopus_20251023
dc.subjectanesthetic agent
dc.subjectarticaine
dc.subjectbupivacaine
dc.subjectfentanyl
dc.subjectlevobupivacaine
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanalogs and derivatives
dc.subjectcesarean section
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintraspinal drug administration
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAnesthetics, Combined
dc.subjectBupivacaine
dc.subjectCarticaine
dc.subjectCesarean Section
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFentanyl
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInjections, Spinal
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.titleComparison Of Intrathecal Plain Articaine And Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl For Caesarean Section
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu