Effects of different larenageal mask types on hemodynamics and airway in pediatric

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-1025-7662en_US
dc.contributor.authorÖtekuş, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorSelçuk Kuşderci, Hatice
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-07T12:20:26Z
dc.date.available2022-06-07T12:20:26Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentMTÖ Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIn pediatric cases, as in adults, supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are common in short-term interventions. We aimed to investigate the effects of these supraglottic airway devices, which we use in pediatric cases, on hemodynamic and airway in our study, in which we used four types of SAD: The LMA Classic, Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (PLA), İ-gel LMA, and Ambu® AuraGain™. 103 patients with ASA 1-2 and under 18 years of age were randomly divided into LMA Classic, Cobra PLA, i-Gel LMA, and Ambu LMA. The demographic data of the patients were recorded. Hemodynamic data, SAD insertion durations, Pre-operative End-tidal CO2, and airway pressures were recorded at induction, intubation (during SAD insertion), and peri-operative 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 10th minutes. As a result of our study, the groups had similar HR and SpO2 values. EtCO2 values were generally similar to the LMA Classic group in cobra PLA. When compared to i-gel LMA and Ambu LMA, Cobra PLA EtCO2 values were high but within the clinically acceptable range as well. Likewise, airway pressures were not statistically different from the classical LMA Cobra PLA. Airway pressure was higher in the Cobra PLA group than in I-Gel LMA and Ambu LMA. However, it was lower than 20 mm H2O. In pediatric cases, LMA Classic, Cobra PLA, I-gel LMA, and Ambu LMA can be used safely in general. However, we think that airway pressures should be followed-up more closely in the use of Cobra PLA.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKusderci, H. S., & Oterkus, M. (2022). Effects of different larenageal mask types on hemodynamics and airway in pediatric. Medicine, 11(1), 166-70.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medscience.2021.12.390
dc.identifier.endpage170en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage166en_US
dc.identifier.uri10.5455/medscience.2021.12.390
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12899/1101
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.institutionauthorOterkus, Mesut
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMesut Öterkuşen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPediatric patients,en_US
dc.subjectdifferent airway devices,en_US
dc.subjectventilation,en_US
dc.subjectairway pressureen_US
dc.titleEffects of different larenageal mask types on hemodynamics and airway in pediatricen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
166-170-53-1638475021-MS-2021-12-390.pdf
Boyut:
387.63 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu