Neuroprotective effects of rosuvastatin in spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorGökçe, Emre Cemal
dc.contributor.authorCemil, Berker
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Zuhal
dc.contributor.authorTake, Gulnur
dc.contributor.authorDurdağ, Emre
dc.contributor.authorErdoğan, Bülent
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-24T18:06:41Z
dc.date.available2025-10-24T18:06:41Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentMalatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: This experimental study was performed to investigate the neuroprotective effects of rosuvastatin in a rabbit model of spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury. Materials and Methods: Rabbits were randomized into 3 groups of 6 animals each: group 1 (control), group 2 (ischemia), and group 3 (rosuvastatin 5 mg/kg/d). Spinal cord ischemia was produced in rabbits by a 30-minute occlusion of the aorta by clamping with aneurysm clips; just caudal to renal artery divison and above the aortic bifurcation. Rosuvastatin was administered intraperitoneally before onset of occlusion, for 3 days. At 48 hours after ischemia, neurological evaluation was performed using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotor rating scale before they were killed. Levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), superoxide dismutase, catalase, nitrite/nitrate, and tumor necrosis factor-? were measured in the spinal cord tissue and plasma. Histopatologic evaluation of the tissues and activation of caspase 3 were also studied. Results: Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scores for rosuvastatin group were significantly higher. MDA, AOPP, and nitrite/nitrate levels in the ischemia group were significantly higher than those for control and rosuvastatin groups (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in MDA, AOPP, and nitrite/nitrate levels between rosuvastatin and control groups. In rosuvastatin group, spinal cord tissue and plasma superoxide dismutase, glutathione, and catalase levels were significantly increased compared with the ischemia group. The gross histopathologic examination demonstrated decrease in axonal damage, neuronal degeneration, and glial cell infiltration after rosuvastatin treatment. Conclusions: Rosuvastatin may protect the spinal cord tissue against ischemic damage, by its anti-inflammation and antiapoptotic effect. Although further studies including different dose regimens and time intervals are required, this drug may therefore be a good candidate for clinical use during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. © 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000022
dc.identifier.endpage196
dc.identifier.issn1534-4916
dc.identifier.issn1050-6438
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84929503657
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage189
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.rog/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12899/3133
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofNeurosurgery Quarterly
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzScopus_20251023
dc.subjectantioxidants
dc.subjectischemia-reperfusion injury
dc.subjectneuroprotection
dc.subjectoxidative stress
dc.subjectrosuvastatin
dc.subjectspinal cord
dc.titleNeuroprotective effects of rosuvastatin in spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu