Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorVarol, Memet
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T09:21:49Z
dc.date.available2021-06-16T09:21:49Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.citationVarol, M. (2019). Phytoplankton functional groups in a monomictic reservoir: seasonal succession, ecological preferences, and relationships with environmental variables. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26 (20), 20439-20453.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05354-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12899/262
dc.description.abstractThe seasonal succession of phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs), their ecological preferences, relationships between environmental variables and PFGs, and ecological status were investigated in the Batman Dam Reservoir, a warm monomictic reservoir, located in the Tigris River basin of Turkey. Altogether 60 species, 19 functional groups, and 10 prevailing functional groups were identified, and prevailing functional groups showed strong seasonal changes. Centric diatoms Cyclotella ocellata (group B) and Aulacoseira granulata (group P) were dominant in the spring, with water mixing and low temperature. Groups F (Elakatothrix gelatinosa, Elakatothrix gelatinosa, and Sphaerocystis schroeteri), J (Pediastrum simplex and Coelastrum reticulatum), G (Eudorina elegans and Volvox aureus), L-M (Ceratium and Microcystis), and H1 (Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and Anabaena spiroides) dominated the phytoplankton community from summer to mid-autumn, with thermal stratification. Groups H1 and P became dominant in the late autumn, with the breakdown of stratification. With the deepening of the mixing zone, groups P and T (Mougeotia sp.) were dominant in the winter. The reservoir was meso-eutrophic according to trophic state index values based on total phosphorus (TP), chlorophyll a, Secchi depth and total nitrogen, habitat preferences of PFGs, and diversity indices of phytoplankton. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that NO3-N, SiO2, TP, pH, and water temperature (WT) were the most important environmental factors controlling PFGs in the BDR. Weighted averaging regression results indicated that among PFGs, groups F and T had a narrower tolerance range for WT, pH, and SiO2, while groups G and T had a narrower tolerance range for TP and NO3-N.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11356-019-05354-0en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPhytoplanktonen_US
dc.subjectFunctional groupsen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental variablesen_US
dc.subjectSeasonal successionen_US
dc.subjectWarm monomictic reservoiren_US
dc.titlePhytoplankton functional groups in a monomictic reservoir: seasonal succession, ecological preferences, and relationships with environmental variablesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6475-0570en_US
dc.departmentMTÖ Üniversitesi, Doğanşehir Vahap Küçük Meslek Yüksekokulu, Su Ürünleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorVarol, Memet
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue20en_US
dc.identifier.startpage20439en_US
dc.identifier.endpage20453en_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster